From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 15 13:52:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2257C1065673 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 13:52:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cbergstrom@pathscale.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADC488FC08 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 13:52:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz15 with SMTP id 15so658882bwz.13 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 06:52:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.125.131 with SMTP id y3mr591210far.9.1284558768449; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 06:52:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.5.149] ([119.42.120.69]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j14sm574565faa.23.2010.09.15.06.52.45 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 15 Sep 2010 06:52:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C90CFF9.20206@pathscale.com> Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 20:54:01 +0700 From: =?UTF-8?B?IkMuIEJlcmdzdHLDtm0i?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jonathan McKeown References: <4C906D49.5090500@gmail.com> <20100915070241.23391390@scorpio> <201009151546.16746.j.mckeown@ru.ac.za> In-Reply-To: <201009151546.16746.j.mckeown@ru.ac.za> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: this is probably a little touchy to ask... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 13:52:50 -0000 Jonathan McKeown wrote: > > Yes. It lies with Sun and Oracle, and the licensing terms that prevent the > FreeBSD project from distributing modified Java packages. More generally, the > problem lies with companies who won't support FreeBSD but also prevent the > project from supporting their product itself. > I've been wanting to ignore this thread because I know the amount of work involved, but.... #1 Why doesn't someone sign-up and get the OpenJDK validation suite? #2 Why doesn't someone pull Icedtea6, build it and then run the OpenJDK validation suite? I don't know if waiting for others is going to get the desired results in this case.. After the project is rolling I'm happy to help make suggestions or give a hand with how to make Hotspot and the whole JDK a little better performance. Thanks ./C