From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Feb 28 23:45:28 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id XAA10944 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 28 Feb 1995 23:45:28 -0800 Received: from wcarchive.cdrom.com (wcarchive.cdrom.com [192.216.191.11]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id XAA10938 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 1995 23:45:27 -0800 Received: from netcom14.netcom.com (hasty@netcom14.netcom.com [192.100.81.126]) by wcarchive.cdrom.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) with ESMTP id XAA06321 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 1995 23:44:59 -0800 Received: by netcom14.netcom.com (8.6.9/Netcom) id XAA13543; Tue, 28 Feb 1995 23:45:05 -0800 Date: Tue, 28 Feb 1995 23:45:05 -0800 From: hasty@netcom.com (Amancio Hasty Jr) Message-Id: <199503010745.XAA13543@netcom14.netcom.com> To: FreeBSD-hackers@wcarchive.cdrom.com, pechter@stars.sed.monmouth.army.mil Subject: Re: Binary compatibility with NetBSD Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >Boy would this be nice. Shared libraries to run Linux stuff and >NetBSD stuff. This is a great idea -- but how doable is it? We may be able to get away with it by using Lites :) Currently, I think that Linux Lite stuff is running behind however I expect that they will catch up soon. I remember reading somewhere in the lites mailing list that *BSD drivers where not that good then a few posting later people asking for the *BSD drivers because the linux ones where not working :) Enjoy, Amancio