From owner-freebsd-chat Sat Feb 22 14:57:41 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA25437 for chat-outgoing; Sat, 22 Feb 1997 14:57:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA25416 for ; Sat, 22 Feb 1997 14:57:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id OAA12088; Sat, 22 Feb 1997 14:53:18 -0800 (PST) To: Terry Lambert cc: ben@narcissus.ml.org (Snob Art Genre), nate@trout.mt.sri.com, chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RMS's view on dynamic linking In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 22 Feb 1997 11:00:13 MST." <199702221800.LAA04811@phaeton.artisoft.com> Date: Sat, 22 Feb 1997 14:53:18 -0800 Message-ID: <12084.856651998@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > You mean when I go on about social engineering. The only thing > political about it is the opposition. Don't confuse political > science with applied sociology. Funny, according to this book, you've been going on about political engineering and the only opposition to it has been social ("this group doesn't want to do all that extra work, go away."). Maybe you're confusing sociology with applied political science and that's why you're not getting anywhere? :-) Jordan