From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 27 14:23:47 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EA84440 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:23:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtprelay03.ispgateway.de (smtprelay03.ispgateway.de [80.67.31.26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A6D91E2B for ; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:23:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [92.204.90.83] (helo=elfsechsundzwanzig.de) by smtprelay03.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1W7n4t-0000bd-Sn; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 15:22:20 +0100 Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 15:22:19 +0100 From: _1126 To: Erich Dollansky Subject: Re: [freebsd-questions] Re: [freebsd-questions] Re: weird error messages with various ports Message-ID: <20140127142219.GA21339@elfsechsundzwanzig.de> References: <20140127120519.Horde.zk6gGzrJZ8n-kUHavzPiTw1@webmail.df.eu> <20140127191858.78a3fa5d@X220.alogt.com> <20140127114919.GA66024@elfsechsundzwanzig.de> <20140127200326.026e6c35@X220.alogt.com> <20140127202342.5cbe5014@X220.alogt.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140127202342.5cbe5014@X220.alogt.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) X-Df-Sender: bGlzdHNAZWxmc2VjaHN1bmR6d2FuemlnLmRl Cc: Charlie , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:23:47 -0000 On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 08:23:42PM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:14:33 +0000 (UTC) > Charlie wrote: > > > My failure occured on a ports tree that was updated about 30 minutes > > ago via portsnap. > > can you try revision 341159? It works here, too.