From owner-cvs-all Fri Feb 21 9:12:41 2003 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A8F937B401; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 09:12:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from gw.nectar.cc (gw.nectar.cc [208.42.49.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06A9C43FB1; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 09:12:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nectar@celabo.org) Received: from madman.celabo.org (madman.celabo.org [10.0.1.111]) by gw.nectar.cc (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D16B55; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 11:12:38 -0600 (CST) Received: by madman.celabo.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5AE7478C3E; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 11:11:29 -0600 (CST) Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 11:11:29 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: Paul Richards Cc: Mark Murray , Dag-Erling Smorgrav , "M. Warner Losh" , ru@FreeBSD.org, cjc@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet in_pcb.c Message-ID: <20030221171129.GB7233@madman.celabo.org> References: <20030221151709.GH68768@survey.codeburst.net> <200302211530.h1LFUiPE034532@grimreaper.grondar.org> <20030221165712.GJ68768@survey.codeburst.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030221165712.GJ68768@survey.codeburst.net> X-Url: http://www.celabo.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i-ja.1 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 04:57:12PM +0000, Paul Richards wrote: > I was only suggesting that there > should perhaps be a class of changes that are marked as "experimental" > so people aren't surprised if that feature gets removed at a later > date. If it turns out in 6-12 months time that a lot of people are > getting caught out by this change then we might want to revert it, and > marking it as an experimental feature makes people think more carefully > about what they're doing. OK, that's reasonable. Why don't you work out the documentation details. However, IMHO, it would not be appropriate to classify the ``change''/``feature'' under question as ``experimental'' in any case. Cheers, -- Jacques A. Vidrine http://www.celabo.org/ NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal Kerberos jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@FreeBSD.org . nectar@kth.se To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message