From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Dec 29 06:19:08 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA04165 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Tue, 29 Dec 1998 06:19:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from axl.noc.iafrica.com (axl.noc.iafrica.com [196.31.1.175]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA04158 for ; Tue, 29 Dec 1998 06:19:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sheldonh@axl.noc.iafrica.com) Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.noc.iafrica.com) by axl.noc.iafrica.com with local-esmtp (Exim 2.10 #1) id 0zuzye-0002e6-00; Tue, 29 Dec 1998 16:18:28 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: Bill Fumerola cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports that don't honour local CFLAGS In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 29 Dec 1998 02:50:59 EST." Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1998 16:18:28 +0200 Message-ID: <10173.914941108@axl.noc.iafrica.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 29 Dec 1998 02:50:59 EST, Bill Fumerola wrote: > By all means, send-pr(1) when you find a port being bad in regards to > this (I just fixed postgresql, recently, for this reason). Hi Bill, Cool, will do. My current peeve is addressed by ports/9234. Can I assume that "the ports team" shares your views on this issue? Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message