From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 22 06:14:20 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CCB416A4CE for ; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 06:14:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A94EF43D41 for ; Sat, 22 Jan 2005 06:14:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) j0M6EDj17033; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 22:14:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "stheg olloydson" , Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 22:14:13 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20050122052751.68119.qmail@web53906.mail.yahoo.com> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Which Way to Partition. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 06:14:20 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of stheg > olloydson > Sent: Friday, January 21, 2005 9:28 PM > To: hindrich@worldchat.com > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Which Way to Partition. > > > Hello, > > This is a bikeshed question, i.e. everyone is expert enough to have an > opinion. As such this has been discussed numerous times on this list. > search the archives and pick whatever theory seems reasonable for your > use. > BTW, having "GNU/Linux -> Freedom" in your sig file when posting to a > *BSD list is a bit of a _faux pas_, wouldn't you agree? > Probably not as much as a faux pas as posting the same message TWICE, stheg, (note message ID's) Message-ID: <20050122050337.62451.qmail@web53906.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20050122052751.68119.qmail@web53906.mail.yahoo.com> Ted