From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org  Wed Oct 26 07:33:00 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52AFCC223ED
 for <freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Wed, 26 Oct 2016 07:33:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu)
Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E1AFD84
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 07:33:00 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu)
Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD))
 (envelope-from <lists@opsec.eu>)
 id 1bzIhj-0007H0-VJ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 09:32:55 +0200
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 09:32:55 +0200
From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>
To: David Demelier <demelier.david@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Horsfall <dave@horsfall.org>,
 FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Inconsistency? (was Re: misc/jive deleted)
Message-ID: <20161026073255.GF51420@home.opsec.eu>
References: <20161022161428.GA7234@lonesome.com>
 <201610232306.u9NN5qN0091649@fire.js.berklix.net>
 <20161024021013.GZ51420@home.opsec.eu>
 <731fbd25-7c43-f2b1-088a-59efa0a7f61d@jetcafe.org>
 <CAO+PfDeLTgTy5WofNZgvQtAjJxb1yA4UrKt5bQHRjEF_s2hM-w@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.BSF.2.11.1610260752410.10059@aneurin.horsfall.org>
 <CAO+PfDezDPRv4u_E6E41_KK5cTkFq7TynfhQc-xjoc_rLrBjGw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAO+PfDezDPRv4u_E6E41_KK5cTkFq7TynfhQc-xjoc_rLrBjGw@mail.gmail.com>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 07:33:00 -0000

Hi!

> I think unless FreeBSD makes explicit antichrist statement, there is
> no problem having a daemon mascot. I have never heard any religious
> problem so far. Or then I missed something.

Approx. 20 years ago (?), some FreeBSD developer with a old-style
logo on a t-shirt was asked to leave some saloon in Texas
because the logo suggested that they worship the antichrist.

There was a job (in rec.humor.funny?) about it 8-}

That's why this reference to the demon logo is made 8-}

-- 
pi@opsec.eu            +49 171 3101372                         4 years to go !