From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 8 06:53:35 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AFEB37B401; Tue, 8 Apr 2003 06:53:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.cordis.lu (mail.cordis.lu [212.190.217.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD8A843F85; Tue, 8 Apr 2003 06:53:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from a.carter@cordis.lu) Received: from mailsvr.intrasoft.lu (mail.intrasoft.lu [212.190.217.251]) by mail.cordis.lu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h38DwK1d024099; Tue, 8 Apr 2003 15:58:20 +0200 Received: by mail.intrasoft.lu with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) id <2HMPCVKG>; Tue, 8 Apr 2003 15:50:52 +0200 Received: from intra241.intrasoft.lu (212.190.217.170 [212.190.217.170]) by mailsvr.intrasoft.lu with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2656.59) id 2HMPCVKF; Tue, 8 Apr 2003 15:50:48 +0200 From: CARTER Anthony To: Ruslan Ermilov , CARTER Anthony Organization: Intrasoft Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 15:53:52 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1 References: <20030408132730.GD19391@sunbay.com> In-Reply-To: <20030408132730.GD19391@sunbay.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200304081553.52781.a.carter@intrasoft.lu> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-131.9 required=4.2 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_KMAIL,USER_IN_WHITELIST version=2.50 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) cc: marcus@freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fontconfig-2.1.92 considered harmful X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2003 13:53:35 -0000 Is the problem during xclock execution or xclock compilation? Anthony On Tuesday 08 April 2003 15:27, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 03:25:29PM +0200, CARTER Anthony wrote: > > Originally (end of last week) there was a loop where the xft had a > > looping > > > dependency that caused an "out of swap space" bug appearing while > > compiling > > > Mesa (among others). > > > > What version of Xft are you using? > > Like I said, I rebuilt everything from ports yesterday. > The latest, Xft-2.1_7. > > > Maybe it is not related, but I am running latest XFree and KDE and > > Xclock and > > > fontconfig without any problems so far ;) > > The WM is not an issue here. > > > On Tuesday 08 April 2003 15:18, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 02:46:39PM +0200, CARTER Anthony wrote: > > > > I had this bug, but now it is over...It has been fixed. Do a CVSUP > > and > > > > all > > > > > > > should now be ok. > > > > > > No. This is with the latest port. Where specifically it > > > was fixed? > > > > > > > On Tuesday 08 April 2003 14:41, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > > > > I have been unlucky to try to do a major update of all > > > > > of my ports, including upgrading XFree86 to version 4.3, > > > > > on my 5.0-CURRENT notebook. > > > > > > > > > > The update went fine except things like xclock(1) now > > > > > angry and eat all system memory and are eventually get > > > > > killed due to the ``out of swap space'' bug ;-). > > > > > > > > > > I've tracked it down to the update of fontconfig port > > > > > to version 2.1.92. Reverting to fontconfig-2.1_7 made > > > > > the symptoms go away. > > > > > > > > > > This was a standard install of XFree86-4, with the > > > > > xf86config(1) generated config file. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers,