From owner-freebsd-net Sat Dec 16 3:27:23 2000 From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 16 03:27:20 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from point.osg.gov.bc.ca (point.osg.gov.bc.ca [142.32.102.44]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F3BC37B402; Sat, 16 Dec 2000 03:27:20 -0800 (PST) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by point.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.8.7/8.8.8) id DAA23718; Sat, 16 Dec 2000 03:26:35 -0800 Received: from passer.osg.gov.bc.ca(142.32.110.29) via SMTP by point.osg.gov.bc.ca, id smtpda23716; Sat Dec 16 03:26:15 2000 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by passer.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.11.1/8.9.1) id eBGBQ9806221; Sat, 16 Dec 2000 03:26:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from cwsys9.cwsent.com(10.2.2.1), claiming to be "cwsys.cwsent.com" via SMTP by passer9.cwsent.com, id smtpdwP6219; Sat Dec 16 03:25:51 2000 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by cwsys.cwsent.com (8.11.1/8.9.1) id eBGBPkP05378; Sat, 16 Dec 2000 03:25:46 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200012161125.eBGBPkP05378@cwsys.cwsent.com> Received: from localhost.cwsent.com(127.0.0.1), claiming to be "cwsys" via SMTP by localhost.cwsent.com, id smtpdDU5367; Sat Dec 16 03:24:58 2000 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 Reply-To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group From: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group X-OS: FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE X-Sender: cy To: "Ari Suutari" Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPFW & IPsec tunnel mode In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 07 Dec 2000 09:20:40 +0200." <001301c0601e$34cab880$0e05a8c0@intranet.syncrontech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2000 03:24:57 -0800 Sender: cy@uumail.gov.bc.ca Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message <001301c0601e$34cab880$0e05a8c0@intranet.syncrontech.com>, "Ari Suut ari" writes: > However, pipsecd only supports fixed keys and Kame seems more > like the future way to go. Would it be possible to enhance ipfw & kame > to work together better in same way (like having some kind of name for > each tunnel and allowing ipfw rule to use them in similar way as > 'via' is used with interfaces) ? Check the -security archives. This was just discussed about a month ago. In that thread a KAME developer explained why it cannot be accomplished. Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 Team Leader, Sun/Alpha Team Internet: Cy.Schubert@osg.gov.bc.ca Open Systems Group, ITSD, ISTA Province of BC To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message