From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 19 13:32:43 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11428DB6; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:32:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@komquats.com) Received: from smtp-out-05.shaw.ca (smtp-out-05.shaw.ca [64.59.134.13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDDF411DF; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:32:42 +0000 (UTC) X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: true X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: v=1.1 cv=7/EMZfWbaVtDMdTqnk9efwidrOfQb3DZMdpNhNw5Oc4= c=1 sm=1 a=QrugwKR0C_UA:10 a=wAGQQ9Az6v0A:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=ICAaq7hcmGcA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=IbtKDeXwb2+SRU442/pi3A==:17 a=BWvPGDcYAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=BewAlsR_AAAA:8 a=tpZSvOLReLEB_uyWUDIA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=6RqQk-FQwCkA:10 a=V7tsTZBp22UA:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=x0uADENsyE8A:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 Received: from unknown (HELO spqr.komquats.com) ([96.50.7.119]) by smtp-out-05.shaw.ca with ESMTP; 19 Jun 2013 07:32:42 -0600 Received: from slippy.cwsent.com (slippy [10.1.1.91]) by spqr.komquats.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D728D80; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:32:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from slippy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by slippy.cwsent.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r5JDWeqs006143; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:32:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@komquats.com) Message-Id: <201306191332.r5JDWeqs006143@slippy.cwsent.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 with nmh-1.5 From: Cy Schubert X-os: FreeBSD X-Sender: cy@cwsent.com X-URL: http://www.komquats.com/ To: Matthias Apitz Subject: Re: ports && 10-CURRENT In-Reply-To: Message from Matthias Apitz of "Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:23:25 +0200." <20130619132325.GB30671@sh4-5.1blu.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:32:40 -0700 Cc: cy@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Niclas Zeising X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Cy Schubert List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:32:43 -0000 You don't understand. devel/imake is a fine piece of software but people = do=20 not want to install more software than they have to. net/vnc comes with=20 it's own integrated Xserver. Using this logic we should integrate=20 x11-servers/xorg into it too. Neither makes sense. The only reason to use= =20 devel/imake is if net/vnc _installs_ its own imake, which it does not.=20 There's no reason to install more software just to build other software i= f=20 we don't need it. It's extra baggage. I'll put net/vnc on my list of 10-exp builds that need fixing. --=20 Cheers, Cy Schubert FreeBSD UNIX: Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org In message <20130619132325.GB30671=40sh4-5.1blu.de>, Matthias Apitz write= s: > El d=EDa Wednesday, June 19, 2013 a las 06:18:58AM -0700, Cy Schubert e= scribi=F3: >=20 > > There are quite a few ports which have issues using the new toolchain= in=20 > > 10. Dragging in imake in ports and the rest of X would be overkill to= o.=20 > > I'll put this on my todo list for 10. >=20 > Hi Cy. >=20 > The port devel/imake is already fine, i.e. the installed imake works > fine; the problem here is that the vnc port tries to make its own > version of 'imake' in its own source tree. >=20 > matthias > --=20 > Matthias Apitz =7C /=22=5C ASCII Ribbon Campaign: www.as= ciiribbon.or > g > E-mail: guru=40unixarea.de =7C =5C / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail > WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ =7C X - No proprietary attachments > phone: +49-170-4527211 =7C / =5C - Respect for open standards >=20