Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2019 15:29:12 +0100 From: Matthias Fechner <idefix@fechner.net> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> Cc: Adam Weinberger <adamw@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, owner-ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r491810 - in head/editors/vim: . files Message-ID: <813e3693817c56e75b71348831e354b1@fechner.net> In-Reply-To: <20190201141856.GB9358@FreeBSD.org> References: <201902011354.x11Ds7Wm062685@repo.freebsd.org> <20190201135814.GA9358@FreeBSD.org> <CAP7rwcgR1LiPRV385kmxzat0cvK8-i3oJsLN8cchsbgnnz_TKA@mail.gmail.com> <20190201141856.GB9358@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 01.02.2019 15:18, schrieb Alexey Dokuchaev: > On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 07:02:44AM -0700, Adam Weinberger wrote: >> ... >> Perhaps I mischaracterized the situation; it is definitely correct to >> say that the discussion on freebsd-ports@ revealed nearly unanimous >> agreement that people would prefer GTK3 be the default. > > This saddens me a lot, in this case. :-( There's nothing broken with > Gtk+2 that would require a "fix" such as Gtk+3. Is there any reason as > to why switch at all, except higher version number? > > ./danfe what I understand from here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GTK%2B Development for GTK+2 has stopped and all remaining bugs will not be fixed. So why do you want to keep on an old version that has known bugs if you can switch to a newer version that is maintained and bugs are fixed? -- Gruß Matthias
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?813e3693817c56e75b71348831e354b1>