From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 25 05:04:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28DE516A4CE; Tue, 25 May 2004 05:04:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from comp.chem.msu.su (comp.chem.msu.su [158.250.32.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69B2D43D48; Tue, 25 May 2004 05:03:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: from comp.chem.msu.su (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by comp.chem.msu.su (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i4PC3g3F003635; Tue, 25 May 2004 16:03:42 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: (from yar@localhost) by comp.chem.msu.su (8.12.9p2/8.12.9/Submit) id i4PC3fAc003634; Tue, 25 May 2004 16:03:41 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from yar) Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 16:03:41 +0400 From: Yar Tikhiy To: Andre Oppermann Message-ID: <20040525120341.GC2791@comp.chem.msu.su> References: <200405232105.i4NL58vw082762@repoman.freebsd.org> <40B13042.DFA15EA8@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40B13042.DFA15EA8@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org cc: src-committers@freebsd.org cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/pci if_dc.c if_rl.c if_sis.c if_ste.csrc/sys/dev/fxp if_fxp.c src/sys/dev/nge if_nge.c src/sys/dev/reif_re.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 12:04:01 -0000 On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 01:14:10AM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote: > > What do you think of splitting out the arpcom out of ifnet the way > NetBSD have done it many years ago? Would you do that together with > me? I'm afraid I must study the issue first :-) -- Yar