From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Jun 15 23:49:59 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk (nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk [193.237.89.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB5EC150DA for ; Tue, 15 Jun 1999 23:49:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nik@nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk) Received: (from nik@localhost) by nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.2) id AAA75076; Wed, 16 Jun 1999 00:09:27 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from nik) Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 00:09:27 +0100 From: Nik Clayton To: Arun Sharma Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [Call for review] init(8): new feature Message-ID: <19990616000927.A74670@catkin.nothing-going-on.org> References: <19990615183926.A31280@relay.ucb.crimea.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i In-Reply-To: ; from Arun Sharma on Tue, Jun 15, 1999 at 08:59:59AM -0700 Organization: Nik at home, where there's nothing going on Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Jun 15, 1999 at 08:59:59AM -0700, Arun Sharma wrote: > While we're on the init topic, is there any strong feeling here about > BSD /etc/rc* scripts Vs SysV ? Yes, lots. The last round of discussion was covered in the freebsd-arch mailing list, the archives should be enlightening. N -- [intentional self-reference] can be easily accommodated using a blessed, non-self-referential dummy head-node whose own object destructor severs the links. -- Tom Christiansen in <375143b5@cs.colorado.edu> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message