Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 14:19:38 -0500 (EST) From: Charles Sprickman <spork@fasttrackmonkey.com> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o_Carlos_Mendes_Lu=EDs?= <jonny@jonny.eng.br> Cc: David Gilbert <dgilbert@dclg.ca> Subject: Re: List of fake vs. real SATA drives. Message-ID: <Pine.OSX.4.61.0411221417120.787@oof.local> In-Reply-To: <41A1FB7D.9000308@jonny.eng.br> References: <16798.12075.465147.307112@canoe.dclg.ca> <864qjixdpi.wl%sf@FreeBSD.org> <41A1FB7D.9000308@jonny.eng.br>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --0-958136458-1101151178=:787 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, [ISO-8859-1] Jo=E3o Carlos Mendes Lu=EDs wrote: > What is the practical diference? Performance? I don't know how much of it to believe, since it is marketing material,=20 but the Seagate white paper on their site claims that all the=20 command-queueing stuff brings the performance very close to that of scsi. This last weekend I put together a box with a 3Ware SATA RAID controller=20 and two of the Seagate drives. The controller is probably a bit of a=20 bottleneck, but that sucker was still incredibly fast for the price (about= =20 $300 for the controller, $100 for for each of the two Seagate 160GB=20 drives). At $2 per mirrored gigabyte, I'm not complaining. Charles > FUJISHIMA Satsuki wrote: >> Currently native SATA drives are still not so popular. There are: >> Seagate Barracuda ATA V, 7200.7, 7200.8 >> Maxtor DiamondMax10, MaXLineIII >> Fujitsu MHT20xxBH(2.5 inch) >> Any other drives (as far as I know, of course) are ATA drive with >> serial-parallel bridge. >>=20 >> At Fri, 19 Nov 2004 12:36:43 -0500, >> David Gilbert wrote: >>=20 >>> Is there anyone compiling a list of "fake" vs. "real" SATA drives? >>> The difference being "fake" drives with ATA-100 electronics and an >>> SATA to ATA conversion chip vs. drives that really support SATA >>> natively? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " > --0-958136458-1101151178=:787--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.OSX.4.61.0411221417120.787>