From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Fri Jul 24 00:47:19 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A96269A9AA7 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:47:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from allbery.b@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x235.google.com (mail-wi0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41C551018; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:47:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from allbery.b@gmail.com) Received: by wibxm9 with SMTP id xm9so6665246wib.1; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 17:47:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=NLbj0GiWiyRaDynnz751oyfxJ+AoNn+eH2nLsM/oQQA=; b=GxvsApR5P8lny3uDQgQ94xA+C5AKJ3QBoTeVyKpwQFbcN1gJpm0AKVSB0E0QSkNRWI eBGiaqhTjKZfY2Ks9qy/NFo9PsWRTED+9r/G7RUe8fTVax7v11ljlNI40uGzkUU/zTJZ x96Xr4x0fDnG9XQaf770ocz/orONAyAUDHY83O0FeK2UnbAX0iMKFmnlLj7WPHgEYyez PEaPfqCM45GVG9DJJyWo6kdUb61d5lQbL8hwEN6pWVl6pi0eX9kDKV6RBmn0toAMTbMJ KQRkMfEResg0xnWqAha4hkiCmkC9SxMp1BUuN0k9MIaLi8dTNMsWaQzFFDTpwhLHhCpo ieXA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.37.48 with SMTP id v16mr1623232wij.79.1437698837765; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 17:47:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.27.133.84 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 17:47:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150724004343.GM84931@FreeBSD.org> References: <55B17B7A.4080402@gmail.com> <20150723234805.GK84931@FreeBSD.org> <55B18488.9060602@sorbs.net> <20150724004026.GA1370@lonesome.com> <20150724004343.GM84931@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 20:47:17 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 10.2-Beta i386..what's wrong..? From: Brandon Allbery To: Glen Barber Cc: Mark Linimon , Michelle Sullivan , freebsd-stable , Jason Unovitch , herbert@oslo.ath.cx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:47:19 -0000 On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 8:43 PM, Glen Barber wrote: > > Even amd64 is no guarantee. I installed one of the Illumos spinoffs on a > > 2GB amd64 netbook (they mostly force zfs). I think it lasted 2 days > before > > the kernel panics started. > > > > Even on amd64, you need to tune the system with less than 4GB RAM. I knew it wasn't going to fly, in fact I looked for ways to get the installer to do ufs instead because I couldn't imagine zfs being able to work in 2GB. Somehow I don't think old netbooks are in Illumos's plans. :) -- brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates allbery.b@gmail.com ballbery@sinenomine.net unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad http://sinenomine.net