Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 22:24:21 +0200 From: Christian Brueffer <chris@unixpages.org> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: Kelly McNeill <kelly@osviews.com> Subject: Re: News Link Submition 10/19/04 Message-ID: <20041025202420.GB64034@unixpages.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0410201253020.7090-100000@pancho> References: <web-11496488@macdock.com> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0410201253020.7090-100000@pancho>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--NMuMz9nt05w80d4+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 12:57:23PM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Kelly McNeill wrote: >=20 > > Paul Webb submitted the following editorial=20 > > to osOpinion/osViews which takes a look at what each BSD=20 > > has to offer and also looks at where each is going. >=20 > Unfortunately after having read the article I'd have to recommend > against our linking to it. There are numerous factual errors > (version numbers and release policies), and in more than just the > FreeBSD section. >=20 > I agree that a really thorough article about this very subject > would be quite useful; however, it would need to be very well > researched to do so. >=20 Yeah, that's the reason I didn't add it in the first place. There are simply too many errors in there. - Christian --=20 Christian Brueffer chris@unixpages.org brueffer@FreeBSD.org GPG Key: http://people.freebsd.org/~brueffer/brueffer.key.asc GPG Fingerprint: A5C8 2099 19FF AACA F41B B29B 6C76 178C A0ED 982D --NMuMz9nt05w80d4+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBfWD0bHYXjKDtmC0RAstRAKC6jSZpPKC4t3vJGUeZASrbScgAhwCgloqy 3dNXdKCmimC3LBflsGQG2cI= =ApVN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NMuMz9nt05w80d4+--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041025202420.GB64034>