From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 3 09:22:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from office.hoster.bg (freefall.freebsd.org [69.147.83.40]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1FC791065670 for ; Mon, 3 May 2010 09:22:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roam@ringlet.net) Received: (qmail 16991 invoked by uid 1000); 3 May 2010 09:22:13 -0000 Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 12:22:13 +0300 From: Peter Pentchev To: Andrius Mork??nas Message-ID: <20100503092213.GA1294@straylight.m.ringlet.net> References: <4BDD28E2.8010201@rawbw.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: yuri@rawbw.com, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GSoC: Making ports work with clang X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 09:22:39 -0000 --x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, May 02, 2010 at 11:51:52PM +0300, Andrius Mork??nas wrote: > On Sun, 02 May 2010 10:25:22 +0300, Yuri wrote: > > Having tried clang++ I have a feeling that it's not quite ready to be a > > generic c++ compiler. [snip] > > Very immature. >=20 > Many problems that C++ ports have with clang is not related to it being > immature, they're related to the fact that clang isn't gcc and that > those ports aren't written in standard C++. Too true. [snip] > > You will just keep stumbling upon various problems with various ports >=20 > I've mentioned that I've been involved with ports+clang since last > October. "Stumbling upon various problems" is what I do. I'm still here, > even doing a GSoC project, so it doesn't look like "various problems" > will scare me off. And as I've mentioned above, just because some ports > don't compile, it doesn't affect this project too much. Well said, well meant. Kudos. Thanks for your work so far, and thanks for taking up that GSoC project. G'luck, Peter --=20 Peter Pentchev roam@ringlet.net roam@space.bg roam@FreeBSD.org PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115 C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13 I am the meaning of this sentence. --x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJL3pXFAAoJEGUe77AlJ98TJIgQAIfCk7JL/drgddZ/AqIstcNs fgRBuu/Xa1i6FwVAiv924ugwyFo0vXclbHuvp6G6xRmghhWWoozs8rd4HyqCr+5X CgLL26a1BTU/fs5dvzd8oAtD+BoIY1NGctiyeJ2vVSTSYNzYeS29fQpJON0eKd++ 4yVguIKkceIT+8F5VstsAQ6SWVg7irN8YvHJSSwUg2UZgOAG80LRdsZ4x5xWby2W +uzIWmbAuUYTvQXdKyKoGvlSoHgIK7/1yJTgknu/y2g87aNpX5kKjqc9KyfgojeI EPW0adz7ykpxTcomWBvLft2tpliMVplG1WSapMqr4kiaaG7Kklntyejx0toqo9el zSXwaXVED97m495SQ04fhdWE8hoNf8cjV+2I46UyoIhKsRm6/T2B1/c7POoFWQzQ NuA+apL9+qiBw5Huw+3/Bm7Y6rLXegaFWL5+vOIiHQQHJPAKNrfPbDKOfOeO5Fd5 cxQThUClCEQsyQcQm7c9lr5DRdAnvEpSooOmzcaahFaCiyW/wZDEunlzHEb2qtGz mcsYn4P39LevHIHla3bD8OlRJWUQitbGQpxMm/grHpFxp27oTcVQGYS02TmM70xy HY/2NFoPI770oMvN6IjmAxlxCBZoEq2cdguxvdQir0XegFoxJlXW5nRTs8bzXBYl dajJG8PP/+lTppAzNTOp =cj+Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn--