From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 23 22:53:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8D8616A420 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 22:53:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail1.fluidhosting.com (mail1.fluidhosting.com [204.14.90.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 45D8543D53 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 22:53:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 92456 invoked by uid 399); 23 Aug 2005 22:53:42 -0000 Received: from 69-175-228-47.vnnyca.adelphia.net (HELO ?192.168.1.100?) (dougb@dougbarton.net@69.175.228.47) by mail1.fluidhosting.com with SMTP; 23 Aug 2005 22:53:42 -0000 Message-ID: <430BA8F3.2000700@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 15:53:39 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Colin Percival References: <200508220933.j7M9Xasc023408@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050822110610.GE941@kaiser.sig11.org> <430A10C5.7080903@freebsd.org> <430B9FBF.3020903@FreeBSD.org> <430BA372.1000606@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <430BA372.1000606@freebsd.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Matteo Riondato , src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/periodic/security security.functions X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 22:53:44 -0000 Colin Percival wrote: > Doug Barton wrote: > >>Colin Percival wrote: >> >>>Matteo Riondato wrote: >>> >>>>Does this fix conf/73992 ? >>> >>>I think so, yes. I've grabbed the PR, and I'll close it after I MFC this >>>change to RELENG_6. >> >>Is there a reason not to merge it into RELENG_5? > > > Yes; the bug doesn't exist in RELENG_5. (The problem appeared when jkoshy > created the daily_status_security_diff_flags knob in September 2004, but > that change was never merged into RELENG_5.) > > Colin Percival > Thanks. Doug