From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 6 16:30:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81F9716A4CE for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2004 16:30:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from silver.he.iki.fi (helenius.fi [193.64.42.241]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 444DF43D39 for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2004 16:30:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pete@he.iki.fi) Received: from [193.64.42.134] (h86.vuokselantie10.fi [193.64.42.134]) by silver.he.iki.fi (8.13.1/8.11.4) with ESMTP id i96GUhsb031641; Wed, 6 Oct 2004 19:30:43 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from pete@he.iki.fi) Message-ID: <41641DB3.2090303@he.iki.fi> Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 19:30:43 +0300 From: Petri Helenius User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Garrett Wollman References: <41640CEE.9070900@web.de> <4164106A.70901@cronyx.ru> <416415DA.9030109@web.de> <200410061628.i96GS3eo046161@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <200410061628.i96GS3eo046161@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD-net cc: Waldemar Kornewald Subject: Re: modularization X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 16:30:47 -0000 Garrett Wollman wrote: >< said: > > > >>Yes, something in that direction, plus: protocols: >>IPv4, IPv6, TCP, UDP, ICMP, IPX, etc. >>Just about everything as modules. >> >> > >It is not generally regarded as a good idea to make artificial >boundaries between (e.g.) IP and TCP. > > > However from the success of the OSI/IP and related (CLNS, TP4, etc) protocols it can said that it's a good way to fail. Pete