From owner-freebsd-bugs Fri Apr 24 09:07:54 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA26438 for freebsd-bugs-outgoing; Fri, 24 Apr 1998 09:07:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA26425; Fri, 24 Apr 1998 09:07:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA09700; Fri, 24 Apr 1998 12:07:41 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 1998 12:07:41 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <199804241607.MAA09700@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: ac199@hwcn.org Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp , freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bin/4183 In-Reply-To: References: <199804191805.LAA23016@freefall.freebsd.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org < said: >> State-Changed-From-To: open-suspended > [...] >> Great idea, now who does it ? > Is it even worthwhile leaving these "suspended" instead of > "closed"? I think so. While the effect may be the same, it is useful to distinguish between ``reasonable but unfinished'' and ``completely dealt with''. (Oh, Gawd, what's wrong with me? Why am I agreeing with Poul-Henning?) -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same wollman@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fires of freedom Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message