From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan  7 23:01:28 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 752C585F;
 Wed,  7 Jan 2015 23:01:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wg0-x236.google.com (mail-wg0-x236.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::236])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08563DBB;
 Wed,  7 Jan 2015 23:01:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id z12so2071437wgg.41;
 Wed, 07 Jan 2015 15:01:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=aIOf8Wltf7dgl397bUFajrgsZWlYyFBZPI6Z9DhBiqA=;
 b=jm0FpH1wPPoUpEIXV7pPzwMxD1rfSEKHGaVDOvUuohw03v9cJxqsFusfrMf6VlNnaA
 My1mpxCfHLaPuKq5MwgAqwDkMnrOVMNm3fAASFAeByUBhwr5CJ0QgsLxa7XDd3OkB3Jd
 MLQaO+Z9X/UDHpqsTTgujmft4ehXypFOFHIsyghE2Nf6X6ovC+hX9wHULHq6nmOqSNYe
 rcChAyQh+COXAGoQZTedZx+t651u/7Xy3LK5cIhyCMOZaQHvJTM+DOQH1UcpiBP68qij
 ZtCKaSTLo1ZQgWn+xR0sGcbD01TVFFkp0eMZNtUYjXFOJxStIbfWpi6NsL8WhOJWuYNU
 aVaA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.126.99 with SMTP id mx3mr12594449wib.66.1420671685698;
 Wed, 07 Jan 2015 15:01:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.241.132 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Jan 2015 15:01:25 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <86bnmagq03.fsf@FreeBSD.org>
References: <slrnmar6bl.23dh.varro@anukis.local> <86bnmagq03.fsf@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 07:01:25 +0800
Message-ID: <CAOc73CCX7+2ZZh=dq0=g-tHd+T4PLQ9tYgM3b-Tw-c1Z-vsBOg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: upgrading texlive broken due to cmake
From: Ben Woods <woodsb02@gmail.com>
To: Raphael Kubo da Costa <rakuco@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 23:01:28 -0000

textproc/py-sphinx port depends on the devel/py-Jinja2 port... but the port
only requires py-Jinja >= 2.3.

Try adding this patch to your ports tree and then retry you build:

Index: textproc/py-sphinx/Makefile
===================================================================
--- textproc/py-sphinx/Makefile (revision 376204)
+++ textproc/py-sphinx/Makefile (working copy)
@@ -14,9 +14,9 @@

 LICENSE=       BSD2CLAUSE

-BUILD_DEPENDS=
${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}Jinja2>=2.3:${PORTSDIR}/devel/py-Jinja2 \
+BUILD_DEPENDS=
${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}Jinja2>=2.7:${PORTSDIR}/devel/py-Jinja2 \

${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}docutils>=0.7:${PORTSDIR}/textproc/py-docutils
-RUN_DEPENDS=
${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}Jinja2>=2.3:${PORTSDIR}/devel/py-Jinja2 \
+RUN_DEPENDS=
${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}Jinja2>=2.7:${PORTSDIR}/devel/py-Jinja2 \

${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}docutils>=0.7:${PORTSDIR}/textproc/py-docutils \

${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}pygments>=1.2:${PORTSDIR}/textproc/py-pygments


--
From: Benjamin Woods
woodsb02@gmail.com

> > tex-kpathsea installed, but texlive-base didn't due to a failure to
> > build the cmake dependency:
> [...]
> > ===>  Building for py27-sphinx-1.2.3
> > /usr/local/bin/python2.7: No module named jinja2
>
> See how this is actually a failure to build the py-sphinx dependency.
> Does the port build if you try to build it individually?