From owner-freebsd-net Sat Nov 17 17:24:35 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from prism.flugsvamp.com (cb58709-a.mdsn1.wi.home.com [24.17.241.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27AEC37B417; Sat, 17 Nov 2001 17:24:33 -0800 (PST) Received: (from jlemon@localhost) by prism.flugsvamp.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) id fAI1N6N07690; Sat, 17 Nov 2001 19:23:06 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from jlemon) Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 19:23:06 -0600 From: Jonathan Lemon To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: net@freebsd.org, jlemon@freebsd.org Subject: Re: t_dupacks to u_int? Message-ID: <20011117192306.A97092@prism.flugsvamp.com> References: <20011117185102.H13393@elvis.mu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre2i In-Reply-To: <20011117185102.H13393@elvis.mu.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On the surface, I don't see a problem with it, but I wonder why you believe it is needed. Changing the value of rexmttresh is probably not a good idea, and I would definitely prefer not to expose it as a user tunable knob. -- Jonathan On Sat, Nov 17, 2001 at 06:51:02PM -0600, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > Any problems with this? > > -static int tcprexmtthresh = 3; > +static unsigned int tcprexmtthresh = 3; > +SYSCTL_UINT(_net_inet_tcp, OID_AUTO, rexmtthresh, CTLFLAG_RW, > + &tcprexmtthresh, 0, "Max duplicate acks before fast rexmit"); > + To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message