From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 10 07:38:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1870106566C; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:38:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsa8923@rit.edu) Received: from ex01fe02.main.ad.rit.edu (ex01fe02.main.ad.rit.edu [129.21.16.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7853A8FC20; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:38:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.105] ([97.87.29.39]) by ex01fe02.main.ad.rit.edu over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 10 Sep 2009 03:26:27 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Benjamin Allen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes Message-Id: Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 21:47:13 -0400 To: stas@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1075.2) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1075.2) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Sep 2009 07:26:27.0151 (UTC) FILETIME=[02231DF0:01CA31E8] Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD Port: ruby-1.9.1.129_1,1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:38:28 -0000 I was just curious why the ruby 1.9 port hasn't been pushed up to patch set 243. It seems to compile and install with no issues when RUBY_PATCHLEVEL=243 is set and file hashes are updated. Let me know if anything needs to be done on this port to help move it along. Kind Regards, Ben