Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 31 Oct 2010 11:10:16 -0600
From:      Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>
To:        Ed Maste <emaste@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: camcontrol rescan all fails if there is no bus 0
Message-ID:  <739687DC-7412-4FAB-A570-A2FD9DC3E06A@samsco.org>
In-Reply-To: <20101031141031.GA14661@sandvine.com>
References:  <AANLkTiksEn2DP7Y=x=u99qcf28bBEspOWRnsWUfhaOPg@mail.gmail.com> <E4EB1292-C4F8-4385-8ACD-58BE792988F1@samsco.org> <20101026160457.GA61133@sandvine.com> <9EC3B874-B089-4ED4-9A12-FA7A0E170A7B@samsco.org> <20101031141031.GA14661@sandvine.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Oct 31, 2010, at 8:10 AM, Ed Maste wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:41:11AM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
> 
>> Ok, I guess I need to see if CAM_XPT_PATH_ID can get returned from the
>> devmatch.
> 
> Is that not handled by this code that parses the returned XPT_DEV_MATCH
> results in in reset_or_rescan_bus:
> 
>    for (i = 0; i < matchccb.cdm.num_matches; i++) {
>            struct bus_match_result *bus_result;
> 
> ...
> 
>            bus_result = &matchccb.cdm.matches[i].result.bus_result;
> 
>            /*
>             * We don't want to rescan or reset the xpt bus.
>             * See above.
>             */
>            if ((int)bus_result->path_id == -1)
>                    continue;
> 
> That is, we do the actual rescan only on legitimate busses after the
> XPT_DEV_MATCH ioctl returns.
> 
>> What happens with this patch if you run it with no real buses
>> registered (i.e. cam module present, but no SIMs present)?
> 
> From the user's perspective, with the stock camcontrol and no
> registered busses I get: 
> 
> [root@edlaptop ~]# camcontrol rescan all
> camcontrol: CAMIOCOMMAND ioctl failed: Invalid argument
> 
> With the patch:
> 
> [root@edlaptop ~]# ./camcontrol rescan all
> [root@edlaptop ~]#
> 
> And then with a umass device attached:
> 
> [root@edlaptop ~]# ./camcontrol rescan all
> Re-scan of bus 0 was successful
> 
> -Ed

That all looks entirely reasonable.  Thanks for researching it.

Scott




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?739687DC-7412-4FAB-A570-A2FD9DC3E06A>