From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Sep 16 13:03:45 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DF45E155CB for ; Sat, 16 Sep 2017 13:03:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-it0-x236.google.com (mail-it0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65B66758A0 for ; Sat, 16 Sep 2017 13:03:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: by mail-it0-x236.google.com with SMTP id e134so5782753ite.3 for ; Sat, 16 Sep 2017 06:03:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=emKF3dK5QwleBnlmEtcsRy0kqKxdx6q42W6ZOVOtupc=; b=F8z0rCIFtj+VmepmrZNq0twTPu3aMYEkhLrpNXVYIOvsGETV/fID61MK8m20VvHk8H 3qAQH4+VlXbNbj+XXKkjiM8HBteXF72XgCmjFS4loPZjYvFWeBy+pp3MZcm8ZuZo8meG gloPFmXRl7OtL6MgGexnMkjdvtDyukTR7JNnl169DSxjj48xLO0wJjj/sa4QBijTCuCE ThfemSVpTOX+SIYNyl3V9yV+v0UuT4WRL85ulvCiS+fhxhawrw6cIFh1zh7XqQJZwJx7 0NjsqIeCcw1KoeQDX8IIAl+g+HShBWt/jRueeyC2Aiu5MoWv+dOd7vUMAQ0ZaiVpzE2r Y/mA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=emKF3dK5QwleBnlmEtcsRy0kqKxdx6q42W6ZOVOtupc=; b=oBFTHuNUTOSy6jVn4KmkSEJ40zPWIMnUdGgUHTXBbTyjQDtz+Yw9NiIa1jl4RPHV/B ddIaNSOgEvHJil+xCeMqCa7/YNhf1Bp0H0DF2JqvZ4NYvxibqZyapqRv/mnLRBS/jUc6 efHy0w3/A+w1ZoJyCzYMVwnu+jLigfseo6k0CR5RnAke5xbamtDry9BmTqYBi3zzTn3Z ewe5JIOA/ZFkocACxI9okHWCZ/epOFjaAaPE7RL9rbZow7WZuKwQ6uL3KUaErSH1x/cz J4DvMdFKsdSkDa4FLdopPZIDx42EsybvRdqj8xQUm4d9X4fIXpSSuxTYhicbd1KdSTN8 EO2w== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUg6NhZI1vugqS3UkQcTkzC7xd+t/GrDguluW5i5aTSW6iFA7jSl B5N26gZ+V5/GGC2jeeZpdtS1cqefPampKiFyVpU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QAtjpv5BcTVDWANXVPWVxW5OeHG/5vlTGVSPfkQP0Lklbo5t+2oJ79f4aYEiNK4ovb3N1mC5lku4iQXLZdCS7k= X-Received: by 10.36.10.142 with SMTP id 136mr8990867itw.92.1505567024532; Sat, 16 Sep 2017 06:03:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.2.145.141 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Sep 2017 06:03:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20170916121755.1297.qmail@irelay.ssr.com> References: <20170916121755.1297.qmail@irelay.ssr.com> From: Adam Vande More Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2017 08:03:43 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Curious pkg upgrade behavior To: Scott Ballantyne Cc: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2017 13:03:45 -0000 On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 7:17 AM, Scott Ballantyne wrote: > On a 10.3-RELEASE-p11 system here. I have been moving to pkg for > upgrades, and today tried a pkg upgrade, which upgraded several of the > ports. After this, Samba failed with an internal error. I'm running > Samba4, but this specific error seems to have been reported only with > versions of Samba36. > > After much head scratching, I noticed that pkg had actually not > upgraded Samba. So I tried running pkg upgrade again, which now > dutifully upgraded Samba and solved my problem. > > I was surprised by this. Not sure if this was my problem, a bug in > pkg, or just some mysterious phase of the moon situation. > > I would have thought pkg could have issued a message if it needed to > be run again? > > Any insight? > /var/log/messages will contain a log of what pkg did, but net/samba4x is not an upgrade to net/samba36 in terms of pkg's. -- Adam