Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 13:57:44 +0200 From: Alberto Villa <avilla@FreeBSD.org> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> Cc: kde@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Update fails for kactivitymanagerd-4.10.5_1 Message-ID: <CAJp7RHZmi1CjrABRezgoo5xuujnGf9RDtjMTAcnyBkYYyDwVBg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20131015114329.GQ91605@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <20131015070610.6339d381@scorpio> <CAJp7RHYTu0%2BhgP29VRnef11NMoXpk4YSgKvZTXWLNhy_hDPffQ@mail.gmail.com> <20131015114329.GQ91605@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> wrote: > We have to limit the number of compilers we do support, and given the different > possible options people can have: CLANG_IS_CC WITHOUT_CLANG WITHOUT_GCC it would > be a nightmare to support all combinaison. Actually I was discussing another issue, that is: lang/clang33 doesn't provide c++11 features, according to the attached log. I'll try changing it to c++11-lib and see what happens, but I think c++11-lang should be enough. Am i wrong? -- Alberto Villa, FreeBSD committer <avilla@FreeBSD.org> http://people.FreeBSD.org/~avilla
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJp7RHZmi1CjrABRezgoo5xuujnGf9RDtjMTAcnyBkYYyDwVBg>