From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 1 16:38:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA31106564A for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 16:38:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f54.google.com (mail-ww0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B5058FC1C for ; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 16:38:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwb24 with SMTP id 24so907250wwb.13 for ; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 09:38:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=IVfh4esZXsbzdBSBD/dIooqZisazWZ/eUM6qTDi1N7k=; b=GGpfa8YcUEtmH0OUVQl4jvRrkq/qVwFPotp7jpKFJFesIwAifaWLj3drXzQN175uHt ZxW2URN4cqQw7KHu6GppShp5WRqyKzbraldpzrZMvlxnzHbqt1wCLfw31GH5NOXmu67Q PkrygG6rks8hH8BpmqqesldN1SyPLVQj6cr8k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=evRVsjEFDM31Edzd7bFWVm4Z+z3IGL+ihzba3RchMNJhKoyynM4HEkRUKVMRMCw1rr dK9OUl1QjZNPjRqXKSWvcVA4QjaAmIgBSrEy05TnECfx6DFMESSP5zX/UqjkJyqx4MM0 Xx4iHjJ8UH17D7NaFVZ37AA1kIONFaT5HAWa0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.7.146 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Apr 2010 09:38:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4BB4C5A1.8050706@janh.de> References: <4BB43D4B.7060507@gmail.com> <4BB4C5A1.8050706@janh.de> Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 09:38:27 -0700 Received: by 10.216.89.195 with SMTP id c45mr530481wef.98.1270139908171; Thu, 01 Apr 2010 09:38:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: From: Jack Vogel To: Jan Henrik Sylvester Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Thomas Gellekum , David Ehrmann , current-list freebsd Subject: Re: Re: Intel H55 and em0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2010 16:38:29 -0000 Yup, gonna MFC the code from CURRENT to STABLE/8 first thing next week, at least that's my plan. Sorry, I thought STABLE/8 already had PCH in it, my bad. I checked and the ALTQ fix is in the tree, so pulling the directory from HEAD and adding it to STABLE/8 should work fine. MFC will be coming first thing Monday. Jack On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote: > On 01/-10/-28163 20:59, Jack Vogel wrote: > >> OH, as to my last statement, the code in CURRENT will NOT work on 8.0 >> RELEASE, >> it would require a change to sys/conf/files, and it also has a fix in the >> stack that is not >> in RELEASE. SO taking the latest would require you take the whole tree. >> >> Jack >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Jack Vogel wrote: >> >> The device subfamily on those motherboards is called PCH, and its only in >>> the em driver as of >>> last December, The CVS delta of if_em is 1.27. You can either update to >>> STABLE/8 or CURRENT. >>> If you wish to just pull the e1000 driver directory it should work fine >>> in >>> 8.0 RELEASE also. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Jack >>> >> > In your correction, you did not really mention 8-STABLE, you only warn > about putting e1000 from CURRENT to 8.0-RELEASE. > > I got the same problem: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-mobile/2010-March/011952.html > > Since I did not get a reply, I put the whole e1000 directory from CURRENT > into 8-STABLE. > > Is there any problem with that? (It _seems_ to work so far.) > > Are you going to MFC the PCH devices to 8-STABLE any time soon? > > Thanks, > Jan Henrik >