From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 14 05:13:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7646216A4CE; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 05:13:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vms042pub.verizon.net (vms042pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 492D043D3F; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 05:13:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi@corbulon.video-collage.com) Received: from corbulon.video-collage.com ([151.204.231.237]) by vms042.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2 HotFix 0.04 (built Dec 24 2004)) with ESMTPA id <0IDB00L8YT692PO0@vms042.mailsrvcs.net>; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 23:13:22 -0600 (CST) Received: from corbulon.video-collage.comcorbulon.video-collage.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j2E5DKpv061265 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 14 Mar 2005 00:13:21 -0500 Received: (from mi@localhost) by corbulon.video-collage.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j2E5DKSk061264; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 00:13:20 -0500 (EST envelope-from mi) Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 00:13:20 -0500 (EST) From: Mikhail Teterin In-reply-to: To: mezz7@cox.net (Jeremy Messenger) Message-id: <200503140513.j2E5DKSk061264@corbulon.video-collage.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL7] Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040615, clamav-milter version 0.73a on corbulon.video-collage.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.43 cc: gnome@freebsd.org cc: openoffice@freebsd.org Subject: Re: intrusive PORTREVISION bumping X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 05:13:22 -0000 > On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 23:43:31 -0500 (EST), Mikhail Teterin > wrote: > > > Why was the PORTREVISION of editors/ooodict-all bumped on Saturday? > > According to the log message, it was to "chase the glib20 version". > > > > The port installs nothing but data and does not even build anything. > > > > I understand, that keeping track of such things complicates gnome's > > upgrade commits, but such gratuitous bumping is going to result in > > plenty of automatic reinstalls around the world _for no good reason > > whatsoever_... > > > > Can it, please, be avoided in the future? Thanks! > > Yes, if you keep your eyes open. > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-openoffice/2005-March/001377.html You must think, I'm on the openoffice@ list. I'm not. I'm just a user of their port(s)... I don't think, they ought to be responsible either -- Gnome@'s method of determining the dependencies is flawed... Yours, -mi