From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Apr 18 12:51:21 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from resnet.uoregon.edu (resnet.uoregon.edu [128.223.122.47])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id ACA6237B424; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 12:51:19 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu)
Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost)
	by resnet.uoregon.edu (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f3IJpHa82480;
	Wed, 18 Apr 2001 12:51:17 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 12:51:17 -0700 (PDT)
From: Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu>
To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>,
	<freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>, Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>
Subject: Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.010418094348.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.33.0104181250340.81356-100000@resnet.uoregon.edu>
X-All-Your-Base: are belong to us
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, John Baldwin wrote:

> Also, in case you aren't aware (this is not to you Drew, I know you know :))
> FreeBSD already has an ia64 port underway in -current.  ia64, x86-64, ppc,
> and a few others are on the radar scope of the FreeBSD developers.

And at one point, the Project even had one or two emulator boxes, software
and hardware, supplied by AMD. Where did those go?

(Yes I know the emulator is ass-slow and a gigantic beast, but it does
work, right?)

Doug White                    |  FreeBSD: The Power to Serve
dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu     |  www.FreeBSD.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message