From owner-freebsd-hardware Sat Jan 6 21:30:40 1996 Return-Path: owner-hardware Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id VAA16601 for hardware-outgoing; Sat, 6 Jan 1996 21:30:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailx.best.com (mailx.best.com [204.156.128.56]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id VAA16596 for ; Sat, 6 Jan 1996 21:30:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from shellx.best.com (shellx.best.com [206.86.0.11]) by mailx.best.com (950911.SGI.8.6.12.PATCH825/8.6.5) with ESMTP id FAA11737 for ; Sun, 7 Jan 1996 05:32:39 GMT Received: from othello.selgus.com (brett.vip.best.com [205.149.181.145]) by shellx.best.com (950911.SGI.8.6.12.PATCH825/8.6.5) with SMTP id VAA12216 for ; Sat, 6 Jan 1996 21:30:39 -0800 Message-ID: <30EF5A63.20E@selgus.com> Date: Sat, 06 Jan 1996 21:30:11 -0800 From: Brett Bourbin Organization: Selgus Limited X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0b4 (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: PS/2 AUX mouse problems with 2.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hardware@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Are there any other issues with the 2.1 psm PS/2 AUX mouse driver, than those listed in the FAQ? I have added a psm0 line (exactly the way it was in the LINT config) along with the PSM_NO_RESET option and made the device, but the kernel still does not think the mouse is there. It is, since I am writing this mail from the same box under Win95. I have looked at psm.c and inserted some debugging printf's and the probe read (the inb() call) is returning 0x55. The check it seems to be doing is if bit 2 is set, the mouse is not there. Is this correct? It also assumes that it is at port 0x60, and IRQ 12. I know the interrupt is correct, and I assume the port it right. Does anyone else have a PS/2 AUX mouse and have it work under FreeBSD? Thanks in advance. -- Brett Bourbin, President SELGUS LIMITED brett@selgus.com 555 Bryant Street, Suite 221 Palo Alto, CA 94301