Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:34:48 +0100 (BST) From: Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bris.ac.uk> To: erwin@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] New mailing pkg-fallout Message-ID: <201307180834.r6I8YmSk034177@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <20130718080450.GM84587@droso.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 10:04:52 +0200 >From: Erwin Lansing <erwin@FreeBSD.org> >To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, ports@FreeBSD.org >Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] New mailing pkg-fallout >On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:14:39PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >> The volume unsustainable. > >You bet it is! Know you know what portmgr has been spending its time on >for all those years and why we keep sining the same old song about >quality control and pre-commit (and not post-commit testing waiting for >a "krismail" from me, Martin, or other portmgr members) testing. If you >feel the volume is to big, here's your change to make a difference! > >Erwin I want to help, but my commitment and skills are not even close to yours. If there is portscluster/portsmon type failure table, I'll check it periodically to see if there are any ports I can work on. And for all maintained ports, the mail should certainly go to the maintainer. Anton
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201307180834.r6I8YmSk034177>