From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 30 09:35:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB141065676 for ; Sun, 30 May 2010 09:35:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cbergstrom@pathscale.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f174.google.com (mail-pz0-f174.google.com [209.85.222.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 687598FC13 for ; Sun, 30 May 2010 09:35:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pzk4 with SMTP id 4so192902pzk.7 for ; Sun, 30 May 2010 02:35:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.89.4 with SMTP id r4mr2100794rvl.79.1275212112763; Sun, 30 May 2010 02:35:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.20.101] ([119.42.85.48]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h11sm3488927rvm.9.2010.05.30.02.35.08 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 30 May 2010 02:35:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C023290.5050706@pathscale.com> Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 16:40:32 +0700 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22C=2E_Bergstr=F6m=22?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: James Mansion References: <4C0108F1.5050004@pathscale.com> <20100529160155.GA3519@anja> <4C013E24.6020204@pathscale.com> <4C015CE5.1050602@feral.com> <4C01647A.4060903@pathscale.com> <4C022FDE.3060404@mansionfamily.plus.com> In-Reply-To: <4C022FDE.3060404@mansionfamily.plus.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Matthew Jacob Subject: Re: Announcing PathDB X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 09:35:20 -0000 James Mansion wrote: > C. Bergström wrote: >> Apologies.. I didn't really expect anyone to know about it. To me >> the best way to describe it is similar to gdb, but much cleaner >> codebase. > Might be more effective to offer this to the llvm community, I would > have thought. While it would be interesting to integrate it with llvm we have our own compiler infrastructure already. fwiw.. I did ping Chris on irc and waiting on feedback for what they'd need in a debugger.. It's probably a piece of the puzzle they simply haven't had a chance to take a look at yet..