Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 18:21:25 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 200236] [maintainer][patch] games/wesnoth: fix for some FreeBSD 10.1 builds Message-ID: <bug-200236-13-fVFzcnycfU@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-200236-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-200236-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D200236 --- Comment #7 from Torsten Z=C3=BChlsdorff <ports@toco-domains.de> --- (In reply to John Marino from comment #6) > well, we had a big PR about wesnoth and potential -devel, which I was aga= inst.=20=20 > I thought you were on that PR. Sadly not. Maybe before i was the maintainer of the port? > Are you saying wesnoth releases are even ? e.g. 1.10, 1.12, 1.14? Until now: yes > I was surprised that 1.13 came out so fast after 1.12 which took like a y= ear. > Personally, I was looking for a single port (only stable). Going back to= 1.12=20 > (with portepoch) is fine, but then I don't get why a -devel version is re= ally=20 > needed. Personally i'm fine with just the stable port. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-200236-13-fVFzcnycfU>