Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 04:28:27 +0000 From: "emaste (Ed Maste)" <phabric-noreply@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] [Commented On] D2005: Start of arm64 toolchain support (sufficient for kernel-toolchain) Message-ID: <35cd5164048de19a63fadbe5036b2f2c@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-xkiyys7g7nptp5rxbteo-req@FreeBSD.org> References: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-xkiyys7g7nptp5rxbteo-req@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
emaste added a comment.
INLINE COMMENTS
Makefile.inc1:325 We can change the test to `BINUTILS_BOOTSTRAP` in `__ALWAYS_NO` instead. It seems reasonable that those cases where we force it off ought to have the default.
Something similar to
```
# If we do not have a bootstrap binutils (because the in-tree one does not
# support the target architecture), provide a default cross-binutils prefix.
# This allows aarch64 builds, for example, to automatically use the
# aarch64-binutils port or package.
.if !empty(__ALWAYS_NO:MBINUTILS_BOOTSTRAP) && !defined(CROSS_BINUTILS_PREFIX)
CROSS_BINUTILS_PREFIX=/usr/local/${TARGET_ARCH}-freebsd/bin/
.if !exists(${CROSS_BINUTILS_PREFIX})
.error In-tree binutils does not support the ${TARGET_ARCH} architecture. Install the ${TARGET_ARCH}-binutils port or package or set CROSS_BINUTILS_PREFIX.
.endif
.endif
```
REVISION DETAIL
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2005
To: emaste, bdrewery
Cc: imp, andrew, freebsd-arm
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?35cd5164048de19a63fadbe5036b2f2c>