Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 30 Jun 1997 01:51:29 +0400 (MSD)
From:      =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.pp.ru>
To:        Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Cc:        cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/shells/bash2 Makefile ports/shells/bash2/patches patch-aa
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.970630014814.1085A-100000@nagual.pp.ru>
In-Reply-To: <199706281416.AAA30758@godzilla.zeta.org.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 29 Jun 1997, Bruce Evans wrote:

> >  Install /etc/shells entry and info dir entry
> 
> Installing ports shouldn't change /etc.  Even installing /usr/src doesn't
> change it.  Reading /usr/local/etc/shells in getusershell() isn't
> appealing, but is no worse than running /usr/local/etc/rc.d/* in /etc/rc.

I not care much about the policy here, I just follow current practice, all
shells installs themself there (at least all packages).  When
getusershell() will be fixed, I'll change ports I maintain. 

-- 
Andrey A. Chernov
<ache@null.net>
http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.970630014814.1085A-100000>