From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Sep 30 19:10:22 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CAFA16A415
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 30 Sep 2006 19:10:22 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40D2043D46
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 30 Sep 2006 19:10:22 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k8UJAM7A066085
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 30 Sep 2006 19:10:22 GMT
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k8UJALmh066083;
	Sat, 30 Sep 2006 19:10:22 GMT (envelope-from gnats)
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 19:10:22 GMT
Message-Id: <200609301910.k8UJALmh066083@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
From: Dan Lukes <dan@obluda.cz>
Cc: 
Subject: Re: ports/103855: security/amavisd-new &amp; security/amavisd-milter
 circular dependence
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Dan Lukes <dan@obluda.cz>
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 19:10:22 -0000

The following reply was made to PR ports/103855; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Dan Lukes <dan@obluda.cz>
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E1bor_K=F6vesd=E1n?= <gabor@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/103855: security/amavisd-new &amp; security/amavisd-milter
 circular dependence
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2006 21:00:55 +0200

 	I think the correct view is - amavisd-milter is for those who want to 
 run amavisd with milter. It use the amavisd-new as supporting port, so 
 it should RUN_DEPEND on it.
 
 	Those, who need new amavis, but don't want the milter interface, need 
 amavisd-new.
 
 	I see no reason to create special options for users who require new 
 amavis with milter interface, but hate amavisd-milter port.
 
 	Of course, you can create slave-variant from both ports, then include 
 them from two separate master ports with different set of options. The 
 amavis-milter will depend on slave-amavisd-milter and slave-amavisd-new, 
 the amavisd-new will depend on slave-amavisd-new and, if required 
 milter, on slave-amavisd-milter.
 
 	But it sound as way to hell for me. As I said above, no user should 
 require new amavis with milter, but rejecting to use amavisd-milter 
 which is exactly for this.
 
 					Dan