Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 10:30:49 +0200 From: Marko Turk <markoml@markoturk.info> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Inactive vs ZFS ARC memory priority Message-ID: <YlaKOW/kwthxAiw%2B@vps.markoturk.info> In-Reply-To: <Yj2%2Bb5SeXa7eub8%2B@vps.markoturk.info> References: <Yj2%2Bb5SeXa7eub8%2B@vps.markoturk.info>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--2oFSxqpjnzRx11do Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 02:06:55PM +0100, Marko Turk wrote: >=20 > Why is old data in Inactive higher priority than new data in ARC? >=20 I did some more tests, and I can't get ARC to push Inactive out. The only workaround I found is to start a program that allocates a lot of memory, then Inactive is pushed out and ARC is allowed to grow. Is there any other workaround that I can do? Regards, Marko --2oFSxqpjnzRx11do Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEhGJv+o0FoHlUFxVJ0ArzBirlGugFAmJWijgACgkQ0ArzBirl GujDMw//VOMtqnfFR4Ygz+jxWSAXQDRnRx1wcAyvjSNFDiAY9uCaujtSVrV2wWcy JbGk+HZoPujhzqrh1M/datY2/I03xyeYzfDwyxcqzg3dG+9u80ZIcVP5gjSNHsI2 Q/qHQkz/PMPYi++bS+jkCE5YUNnl5Jni0biVW/I7EfO1AFr4pIS5RZLWPD+CCri/ ko1wjEJrUMIYvDj1dQNIzON8jupEwXxVEe7Khrb27G2J273Ux3wxxTaYtums9dr6 v9C61MGH8rtsVDl6YSsQoai1sh4NCBl1hffsWJ12pKzqX65yakBbkOl79+maz7kQ tjWtchDRS7vj8pUV9vtrYOvKfebKPHOf+721vzEsmCif6owh0eOrOtOKLcWLnIz8 5iNBocY4CGVxFiFbrGud7JaWd1Dr+tAw7K84haezfHsTcIWOuEK98yTnhm2+sz+K dFpUkJXADGpGVczPmIwvcyEqZVjnK8wDoPoAqvMpeD4oLHktN9k3hcEcmCw45jns h/hIggTdxgLIOm8KFhr6vR6IFqyo2oUGLbp4MHatz/SW6IKo7MI2KVwMdaEpHIJg J/Rk1nPaoDzNG6rn/4VaetfMkCOxBRmaQr8yxYMoW0qmB8KREWzChlMG+tlsA0vq 9jtGXY17NmDkJrGWppXsvv+/xNgFBNaa7OgRvp/uKUZ1a/eH9Jg= =dovg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2oFSxqpjnzRx11do--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?YlaKOW/kwthxAiw%2B>