From owner-freebsd-alpha Tue Jun 13 10:18:27 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from feral.com (feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E6E337B8C9 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2000 10:18:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mjacob@feral.com) Received: from semuta.feral.com (semuta [192.67.166.70]) by feral.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA03852; Tue, 13 Jun 2000 10:18:21 -0700 Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 10:18:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Jacob Reply-To: mjacob@feral.com To: "Daniel C. Sobral" Cc: alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: new cleverness? In-Reply-To: <39466C04.9DDC966E@newsguy.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > Ah, well, the the "module:" message does show up. :-) > > Though it still doesn't make sense. Do you have /boot/loader.conf.local > by any chance? Can you take a look at the commands on loader.4th(8) and > use them to check if the loading of the above modules is, indeed, turned > on? > > Alternatively, it might be the dependency stuff. The config -r solution > would point in this direction, though I'd be at loss to explain the > "module:" messages then. The kernel in question had been built with config -r. I'm in the process of trying a fresh system- I'm taking my working system (which I just built a successful kernel on) and I'll clone the disk and try again. I think we'll write this one off as FM for the moment. -matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message