From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Dec 16 18:30: 7 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F4137B41A for ; Sun, 16 Dec 2001 18:30:01 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id fBH2U1g08373; Sun, 16 Dec 2001 18:30:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 18:30:01 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200112170230.fBH2U1g08373@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Steve Price Subject: Re: ports/32917: bsd.ports.mk fails for innocent $GREP_OPTIONS Reply-To: Steve Price Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/32917; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Steve Price To: clemensF Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/32917: bsd.ports.mk fails for innocent $GREP_OPTIONS Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 20:26:28 -0600 On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 01:31:10AM +0100, clemensF wrote: > > it took literally hours to find out that those GREP_OPTIONS were the cause, > and i'd like the ports-maintainer to unset this option in the make file (perhaps > putting ``GREP_OPTIONS=""'' somewhere near the top?). Does adding GREP_OPTIONS='' to /etc/make.conf help? If not, then it won't help by adding it to the port's Makefile either. If it does, then I thinks that's the best solution. Someone might have a very good reason for setting GREP_OPTIONS and for bsd.port.mk to blithely undo that setting isn't the right solution IMHO. -steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message