From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 22 13:53:17 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E3DD16A4CE for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:53:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kane.otenet.gr (kane.otenet.gr [195.170.0.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6500143D5C for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:53:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226])j1MDr5qD001600; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:53:05 +0200 Received: from orion.daedalusnetworks.priv (orion [127.0.0.1]) j1MDrDOL081359; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:53:13 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost)j1MDrDgC081358; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:53:13 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:53:13 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: decouto@lcs.mit.edu, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20050222135313.GA81336@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> References: <200502221333.j1MDXo0t086246@freefall.freebsd.org> <20050222134026.GE805@straylight.m.ringlet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050222134026.GE805@straylight.m.ringlet.net> Subject: Re: docs/30873: ``ip'' man page does not specify byte order for ip header with raw sockets X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:53:17 -0000 On 2005-02-22 15:40, Peter Pentchev wrote: >On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 01:33:50PM +0000, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >> Synopsis: ``ip'' man page does not specify byte order for ip header with raw sockets >> >> State-Changed-From-To: patched->closed >> State-Changed-By: keramida >> State-Changed-When: Tue Feb 22 13:32:59 GMT 2005 >> State-Changed-Why: >> The RELENG_5 branch was created after this change was committed to HEAD. >> This means that the change is already in 5-STABLE, so there is no need >> to keep this PR open as "patched". > > What if Bruce meant to MFC it to RELENG_4, too, and then plain > forgot? This PR would (okay, should have) served as a reminder to > that effect... Yes, I know RELENG_5 is the official stable branch, > but is it now our official Project policy that RELENG_4 is the > official stale branch? :) Commits to 4.X are no longer possible, unless I have misunderstood the messages posted by RE after the release of 4.11. It is possible that I have misunderstood the intention of the release engineers, in which case we should reopen the PR and let Bruce handle it.