From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Mar 10 11:55:57 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 57B3116A4CE; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 11:55:57 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from postfix4-2.free.fr (postfix4-2.free.fr [213.228.0.176])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 13C0F43D31; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 11:55:57 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from tataz@tataz.chchile.org)
Received: from tatooine.tataz.chchile.org
	(vol75-8-82-233-239-98.fbx.proxad.net [82.233.239.98])
	by postfix4-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8E362E0F6A;
	Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:55:55 +0100 (CET)
Received: by tatooine.tataz.chchile.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 803FA407C; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:55:52 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:55:52 +0100
From: Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org>
To: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20050310115552.GK34822@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org>
References: <200503091838.06322.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com>
	<20050310004919.GA34206@hub.freebsd.org> <87d5u7n2xh.fsf@neva.vlink.ru>
	<20050310114410.GJ4908@eddie.nitro.dk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050310114410.GJ4908@eddie.nitro.dk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i
cc: Denis Shaposhnikov <dsh@vlink.ru>
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: the current status of nullfs, unionfs
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 11:55:57 -0000

> That obviously depend on your use of jails and nullfs.  It works just
> fine for me.

For me too.  I mount /bin /sbin /lib /usr/bin /usr/sbin /usr/lib
/usr/libexec /usr/libdata /usr/share in all my jails using nullfs, thus
I avoid wasting storage space and an upgrade of the host also
automatically updates all jails.  This is IMO a very neat way do manage
jails.  But since my jails are neither very stressed nor time critical,
I can't tell how high the speed penalty is with nullfs.  I'm pretty
curious about this

Regards,
-- 
Jeremie Le Hen
< jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >