From owner-svn-src-all@freebsd.org Sat Oct 10 13:44:10 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF35FA10760; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 13:44:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 485E01CA3; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 13:44:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t9ADbhXL082705; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 16:37:43 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 16:37:43 +0300 (MSK) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Jean-S=E9bastien_P=E9dron?= cc: Slawa Olhovchenkov , svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r289109 - head/sys/dev/drm2/i915 In-Reply-To: <561900B6.5000306@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: References: <201510100743.t9A7h2OI000544@repo.freebsd.org> <20151010093503.GA42243@zxy.spb.ru> <5618E51A.7030300@FreeBSD.org> <20151010102233.GJ6469@zxy.spb.ru> <561900B6.5000306@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 6B691B03 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (woozle.rinet.ru [0.0.0.0]); Sat, 10 Oct 2015 16:37:45 +0300 (MSK) X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 13:44:11 -0000 On Sat, 10 Oct 2015, Jean-S?bastien P?dron wrote: > That said, I'm not sure a kernel from HEAD will work nicely with > userland from 10.2. That's worth a try. well, it should -- otherwise stable/10 jails would not work under -current. Not the other way os course. -- Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] [ FreeBSD committer: marck@FreeBSD.org ] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------