From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 4 02:07:09 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE623BD8 for ; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 02:07:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.parts-unknown.org (mail.parts-unknown.org [50.250.218.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF81111A for ; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 02:07:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.parts-unknown.org (Postfix, from userid 80) id 25B365B3BD24; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 19:07:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.parts-unknown.org (mail.parts-unknown.org [2001:470:67:119::4]) by mail.parts-unknown.org (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 19:07:09 -0700 Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 19:07:09 -0700 Message-ID: <20150403190709.Horde.FPdgiP1gQPdvOyg1X285qQ2@mail.parts-unknown.org> From: David Benfell To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why does FreeBSD insist on https? References: <20150403183957.GA1379@WorkBox.Home> <551F24FF.9020101@columbus.rr.com> <551F2E2D.6090106@bluerosetech.com> <551F43B7.2020905@columbus.rr.com> In-Reply-To: <551F43B7.2020905@columbus.rr.com> User-Agent: Horde Application Framework 5 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=_lzR0kZr7dGYM2gTuFQnORQ1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2015 02:07:09 -0000 This message is in MIME format and has been PGP signed. --=_lzR0kZr7dGYM2gTuFQnORQ1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Quoting scrat : > On 04/03/15 20:19, Mel Pilgrim wrote: >> On 2015-04-03 16:40, scrat wrote: >>> On 04/03/15 14:39, Bigby James wrote: >>>> On a lark, I went ahead and installed Firefox, Chromium, Dillo,=20=20 >>>>=20VimB, Luakit, >>>> UZBL, surf, SeaMonkey, Conkeror, w3m and lynx. Every one of them=20=20 >>>>=20is able to >>>> access https://www.freebsd.org without any problem, with the=20=20 >>>>=20exceptions of UZBL >>>> and lynx, which each complain about SSL/TLS issues (which can in turn = be >>>> circumvented in their respective configurations). >>> >>> NCSA Mosaic? >> >> Considering NCSA Mosaic wouldn't even work on a modern website, I=20=20 >>=20think we can safely remove it from the test cases. ;) >> > > > But I still have it installed on my RedHat 5.2 ( do you want a copy?=20= =20 >=20) from many years ago ( middle 1990's ), i386 with several MBs of=20=20 >=20ram......all 16 of them. This thread *is* satire, isn't it? --=20 David Benfell --=_lzR0kZr7dGYM2gTuFQnORQ1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: PGP Digital Signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAABAgAGBQJVH0dNAAoJEBV64x4SNmAr0BQQAIgPQJ6RvsnQ4hw3XqSieM5n GdSuaDqtUawAzHyDiJ7of8/A37F4CQh1t6NgETmZqYANJ3Zxp+jJTPo2nuttz/OF jjNYyOKfQtOf9CYbIIUfKg7rTkp7Ff29kkS1Jc14nGGFn5xy/GKwVE3V1rOSeva8 VRliNWYEESSdd5/hPZ4N7IFWvA86cn8znPFlyMuboi4Ta6aR1b/LtFIGTnbEjdi6 zqrr5uAzD0NEViIYCeEecKO3+PlGq/6k4BSwQkAcuOlJXpPObruFAv17eNTC8L1q PsV22ZeXSU719Dmo6fQduf9zFIvBU2gw7jHwE9B6Tb0K6kEMWo6ZMouOQlk2ufAV kjKxioYghqZf90Kdnp+445fR5VNUbR86j61+yIXHhLAws8SnFZAc1jWNpfPmo1xc qETugFmlcMI5507TjW5FIEi2qN+iE+F9pS3fhWFOC9a1m1wUUZMCmlp4ZUaXPuHO NksBO/m9z45btHtASNC/OqbCMzQk8u8qCnBD3T2rWCy/tcfAPlQLMZMykDFf4Rar n1ZYf2UnMSX9XILLak1oRLtsMoVVK6eirZCq5mTL0D+Wyjl+s6CeIaS5ofzBeyqo GIPBcz4GtSi2Y2PnXHfVjb6Do5cvQcvB/w+wWqSxNrQjNcH961PtymgqKffmTWSj 7Dg5GC4GJ+Xd9vqfWvs9 =WWbv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=_lzR0kZr7dGYM2gTuFQnORQ1--