From owner-freebsd-current Thu Oct 17 21:41:52 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id VAA23855 for current-outgoing; Thu, 17 Oct 1996 21:41:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA23850; Thu, 17 Oct 1996 21:41:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199610180441.VAA23850@freefall.freebsd.org> To: "Marc G. Fournier" cc: Michael Hancock , Satoshi Asami , current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Iozone: local vs nfs drives In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 18 Oct 1996 00:22:11 EDT." Date: Thu, 17 Oct 1996 21:41:50 -0700 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > No, it doesn't, but I think it might bring up another point... >is there a way of having tagged-command queueing enabled by default? If >there is the potential to see such a boost in performance as has been >reported, at least in the 'write' department...is there a disadvantage >to it that hasn't been brought up? It will be enabled by default as soon as we have a system in place to allow quirk entries for devices that botch tags. In the SCSI code on the 'SCSI' branch, tagged queueing is handled by the generic SCSI layer which allows for the addition of just such a quirk trivially. In short, this will happen... most likely in current before another month has passed. > >Marc G. Fournier scrappy@ki.net >Systems Administrator @ ki.net scrappy@freebsd.org > -- Justin T. Gibbs =========================================== FreeBSD: Turning PCs into workstations ===========================================