From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 1 10:06:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36EC216A420; Wed, 1 Mar 2006 10:06:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE61D43D4C; Wed, 1 Mar 2006 10:06:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65C022089; Wed, 1 Mar 2006 11:06:09 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Tests: AWL,BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Learn: ham X-Spam-Score: -2.4/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on tim.des.no Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB64A2083; Wed, 1 Mar 2006 11:06:08 +0100 (CET) Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C8DCB33C4C; Wed, 1 Mar 2006 11:06:08 +0100 (CET) From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Ade Lovett References: <44013740.6000609@kashzone.info> <86r75qednn.fsf@xps.des.no> <440248FD.6080806@paradise.net.nz> <86veuz7c9u.fsf@xps.des.no> <4404CB8E.1020300@paradise.net.nz> <86lkvu64my.fsf@xps.des.no> Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 11:06:08 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Ade Lovett's message of "Wed, 1 Mar 2006 00:23:15 -0800") Message-ID: <86d5h6iinj.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /bin/sh doesn't run autoconf'ied configure scripts correctly X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 10:06:17 -0000 Ade Lovett writes: > Of course, the next step, now that the pain of the single libtool is > mostly behind us (devel/gnu-libtool is slated for demolition fairly > soon) Huh? Why? What will developers working on software that uses libtool use? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no