From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Jul 14 21:33:49 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA13144
          for freebsd-current-outgoing; Tue, 14 Jul 1998 21:33:49 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA13139
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 14 Jul 1998 21:33:48 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1])
	by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA29057;
	Tue, 14 Jul 1998 21:32:35 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
To: Mikhail Teterin <mi@video-collage.com>
cc: 
Subject: Re: STOP THE BLOODY CROSS POSTING! 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 14 Jul 1998 22:08:43 EDT."
             <199807150208.WAA29904@xxx.video-collage.com> 
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 1998 21:32:35 -0700
Message-ID: <29054.900477155@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> There may be situations when it is desirable to get the message to
> more then one list. It is, of course, causing a high level of
> annoyance if the intersection between the lists is high.

The charters are pretty clear on that - it's really not open
to debate. :(

> IMHO, this should be handled by mailing list software. Make sure
> no-one gets the same message ID twice is rather simple, since all

Tell it to the postmaster - I've been trying to convince him of
this for ages. :)

- Jordan

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message