From owner-freebsd-current  Thu Jul 31 00:35:19 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA12900
          for current-outgoing; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 00:35:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA12895
          for <freebsd-current@freefall.FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 00:35:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.6/8.6.9) with ESMTP id AAA20288; Thu, 31 Jul 1997 00:34:53 -0700 (PDT)
To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@glue.umd.edu>
cc: FreeBSD current <freebsd-current@freefall.FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: core group topics 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 31 Jul 1997 03:14:25 EDT."
             <Pine.BSF.3.96.970731030619.16171F-100000@Journey2.mat.net> 
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 1997 00:34:53 -0700
Message-ID: <20284.870334493@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> I agree.  How long have we had to discuss it so far?  I think you'll have
> to agree, it's been more than long enough.  It feels more like a case of
> "if we ignore it long enough, maybe it'll go away."  There are ways to

Well, that's one way to look at it.  Another way to look at it is that
a significant percentage of people looking at the whole idea have so
far gone "No, I'm outright OPPOSED to this idea.  I do not want ELF."
It's not as passive a situation as you might think.

						Jordan