Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 5 Mar 2014 15:50:01 GMT
From:      Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bris.ac.uk>
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: ports/186945: graphics/jbig2dec: ia64 current: FAIL: test_jbig2dec.py, env: python: No such file or directory
Message-ID:  <201403051550.s25Fo1l2051685@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/186945; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bris.ac.uk>
To: bug-followup@freebsd.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: ports/186945: graphics/jbig2dec: ia64 current: FAIL: test_jbig2dec.py, env: python: No such file or directory
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 07:42:24 -0800 (PST)

 seems mail(1) cut my previous mail on the
 line with minuses, resenting:
 
 >From mexas Wed Mar  5 15:31:58 2014
 >To: bug-followup@freebsd.org
 >Subject: ports/186945: graphics/jbig2dec: ia64 current: FAIL: test_jbig2dec.py, env: python: No such file or directory
 >Reply-To: mexas@bris.ac.uk
 >
 >The tests pass ok when the port
 >is built manually, not in a poudriere jail:
 >
 >make -C /usr/ports/graphics/jbig2dec/work/jbig2dec-0.11 check-TESTS
 >verifying SHA-1 implementation... ok
 >PASS: test_sha1
 >Checking '../ubc/042_1.jb2' for correct decoded document hash ... ok
 >Checking '../ubc/042_2.jb2' for correct decoded document hash ... ok
 >Checking '../ubc/042_3.jb2' for correct decoded document hash ... ok
 >Checking '../ubc/042_4.jb2' for correct decoded document hash ... ok
 >Checking '../ubc/042_5.jb2' for correct decoded document hash ... ok
 >Checking '../ubc/042_6.jb2' for correct decoded document hash ... ok
 >Checking '../ubc/042_7.jb2' for correct decoded document hash ... ok
 >Checking '../ubc/042_8.jb2' for correct decoded document hash ... ok
 >Checking '../ubc/042_9.jb2' for correct decoded document hash ... ok
 >Checking '../ubc/042_10.jb2' for correct decoded document hash ... ok
 >Checking '../ubc/042_12.jb2' for correct decoded document hash ... ok
 >Checking '../ubc/042_15.jb2' for correct decoded document hash ... ok
 >Checking '../ubc/042_16.jb2' for correct decoded document hash ... ok
 >Checking '../ubc/042_17.jb2' for correct decoded document hash ... ok
 >Checking '../ubc/042_18.jb2' for correct decoded document hash ... ok
 >Checking '../ubc/042_19.jb2' for correct decoded document hash ... ok
 >Checking '../ubc/042_20.jb2' for correct decoded document hash ... ok
 >Checking '../ubc/042_21.jb2' for correct decoded document hash ... ok
 >Checking '../ubc/042_22.jb2' for correct decoded document hash ... ok
 >Checking '../ubc/042_23.jb2' for correct decoded document hash ... ok
 >------------------------------------------------------------------------
 >ran 20 tests in 11.491 seconds
 >
 >PASSED all 20 tests
 >PASS: test_jbig2dec.py
 >testing jbig2 huffmann decoding...      (should be 8 5 (oob) 8)
 >8 5 (oob) 8 
 >PASS: test_huffman
 >PASS: test_arith
 >==================
 >All 4 tests passed
 >==================
 >#
 >
 >So something is going wrong with python,
 >but only inside poudriere...
 >
 >Thanks
 >
 >Anton
 >



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201403051550.s25Fo1l2051685>