From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Sep 19 18:49:17 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id SAA11260
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 19 Sep 1995 18:49:17 -0700
Received: from UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU (root@UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU [129.7.1.11])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with SMTP id SAA11252
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 19 Sep 1995 18:49:10 -0700
Received: from Taronga.COM by UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU with UUCP id AA22540
  (5.67a/IDA-1.5); Tue, 19 Sep 1995 20:33:33 -0500
Received: (from peter@localhost) by bonkers.taronga.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id UAA13405; Tue, 19 Sep 1995 20:20:34 -0500
From: peter@taronga.com (Peter da Silva)
Message-Id: <199509200120.UAA13405@bonkers.taronga.com>
Subject: Re: Policy on printf format specifiers?
To: terry@lambert.org (Terry Lambert)
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 1995 20:20:33 -0500 (CDT)
Cc: peter@taronga.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <199509191902.MAA10393@phaeton.artisoft.com> from "Terry Lambert" at Sep 19, 95 12:02:39 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 143       
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

> If you consider reducing the MAXPATHNAME by one for every expansion,
> then yes, I suppose it does.

Why does NAMEI need to expand anything?